The Case of Michael Blair Wellington: A Miscarriage of Justice
Michael Blair Wellington’s story is one of grave injustice, failed legal defense, and an urgent need for public awareness and support. Convicted of homicide in what was, by all available evidence, an act of self-defense, Michael now fights for his freedom against a system that failed him at every turn. His case is a stark example of what happens when inadequate legal representation, a lack of thorough investigation, and prosecutorial overreach converge to strip an innocent man of his liberty.

The Events Leading to Injustice
On December 19, 2020, a confrontation between Michael and Johnny Earl Jackson turned deadly. The available evidence—including witness testimony and investigative analysis—strongly suggests that Michael acted in self-defense. According to a sworn declaration by Dana Orent, a defense investigator assigned to the case, Attorney Ray Newman failed to conduct a thorough investigation and provided only minimal effort in defending Michael. Orent stated that the attorney never furnished him with full discovery, limited his investigative scope to only two interviews, and ignored several potential avenues that could have proven Michael’s innocence.
One of the most shocking revelations comes from an interview with Zondra Flowers, Michael’s wife, who was present during the critical moments leading up to the shooting. She revealed that Johnny Jackson assaulted her by shoving her, and she witnessed Jackson pulling a firearm before Michael acted in self-defense. Despite this, the prosecution discouraged her from testifying by suggesting she could face criminal charges for being an accessory after the fact—a claim that had no legal merit but effectively silenced a crucial witness.
Michael’s Own Words: Imagine His Voice
In a powerful personal statement titled Imagine My Voice, Michael Wellington himself provides a firsthand account of the events and emotions leading up to the tragic confrontation. He describes his attempts to build a stable life as a homeowner, only to be faced with threats, provocation, and an imminent sense of danger. Michael recalls how Johnny Jackson, heavily intoxicated, made violent threats against him and his wife. His brother, Jonathan Wellington, further escalated the situation, inciting violence against him.
Michael questions the narrative presented at trial, pointing out that the Castle Doctrine and self-defense laws should have protected him, yet he was prosecuted as if those rights did not apply. He raises pressing concerns about racial disparities in the justice system, asking whether he would have been treated differently if he were not a person of color.
He also highlights key investigative failures, including the failure to collect forensic evidence on a firearm introduced into the case later and the suppression of exculpatory witness testimony. His emotional distress, fight-or-flight response, and the extreme emotional disturbance caused by the threats against him and his wife were all ignored in court.
The Attorney’s Failures
Attorney Ray Newman’s incompetence or negligence cannot be overstated. Witnesses and investigators confirmed that Newman, who was in failing health at the time, did not have the capacity to manage a case of this magnitude. He refused to provide full discovery to his own defense investigator, failed to present crucial witness testimony, and ignored evidence that could have changed the outcome of the trial. Furthermore, despite concerns about his declining health, Newman denied that it affected his ability to defend Michael—a claim that multiple witnesses, including Orent, have directly contradicted.
Adding to this failure, court records indicate that Michael’s brother, Jonathan Wellington, provided testimony that aligned more with the prosecution’s narrative rather than supporting his own brother. According to Flowers’ statement, Jonathan was outside during key moments and could not have witnessed the events he testified to in court.
Motion for a New Trial: A Fight for Justice
Michael’s legal team has since filed a motion for a new trial, citing ineffective assistance of counsel and newly uncovered evidence that was never presented during his original trial. The motion emphasizes the lack of a complete defense strategy, the failure to call key witnesses, and the improper legal advice given to Zondra Flowers, which effectively silenced her testimony. These issues, compounded by an inadequate investigation, raise serious questions about the integrity of Michael’s conviction and demand judicial reconsideration.
Why Michael Needs Public Support
Michael’s case is not just about one man—it is about the fundamental right to a fair trial. A conviction based on inadequate representation and suppressed evidence is a stain on the justice system. Michael deserves a new trial, one where all the facts are presented and where he is given the defense he should have received from the beginning.
This is why we are calling on the public to support Michael’s fight for justice. Whether through spreading awareness, reaching out to legal advocacy groups, or contributing to his legal defense fund, your support can make a difference in correcting this miscarriage of justice.
Michael Blair Wellington was denied his day in court with a competent defense. Now, we must stand with him to ensure that justice is finally served. Join us in this fight and help bring the truth to light.